Search
Professionals
Further to our newsletter in September 2021, the revised Korean Patent/Trademark/Design Acts including the following noteworthy changes will take effect on April 20, 2022. A. [Patent/Trademark/Design] The statutory period for appealing a Final Rejection is extended to three (3) monthsUnder the revised Acts, the statutory period for appealing a Final Rejection is ext…
The IPTAB had previously determined indicated that the patented invention, which is directed to a novel mechanism for correcting the position of a wafer in a wafer transfer device, lacks an inventive step over the Cited Reference, and thus, the subject patent should be cancelled. Based on the thorough analysis of the Cited reference, Lee International argued during a technical he…
The subject invention relates to a laser processing method and a laser processing apparatus for forming a laser processed hole, a conclusive final rejection was issued by the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) on the basis that the subject invention lacks an inventive step over the prior art references (“D1” and “D2”). However, LEE INTERNATIONAL successfully convinced the Intellectual Prop…
The invention in question relates to a method of analyzing phonocardiogram (PCG) data and electrocardiogram (ECG) data obtained from a portable sensor device. The claimed invention is characterized by dividing phonocardiogram data and electrocardiogram data in time segments, discarding low quality time segments and determining whether the heart is considered to need further examination based…
A bill revising the Korean Patent Act was passed on July 23, 2021, expanding the scope of refund of examination fees.In Korea, when filing a request for examination of a patent application, an applicant pays official fees, which are calculated based on the number of claims. Under the current Patent Act, the official examination fees are limitedly refunded if the applicant files a request for…
The subject invention relates to a memory cell and a memory array, and the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) issued a Decision of Refusal of Amendment asserting that a new ground for inventive step rejection was raised based on the amendment filed along with a request for continued examination. Further, a conclusive Final Rejection was also issued by asserting that the invention in …
The application in this case relates to an autonomous driving technology of a vehicle. The Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) finally rejected the application for lack of an inventive step over a combination of three cited references (“Cited References 1 to 3”). In response thereto, LEE INTERNATIONAL appealed against the Final Rejection with the IPTAB, which was persuaded by ou…
The Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board (IPTAB) ruled on January 25, 2021 that the invention of a patent application entitled “Organic Laser” (“Subject Application”), which is handled by LEE INTERNATIONAL, has an inventive step. Particularly, the Subject Application was finally rejected for lack of an inventive step by the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) twice. Howe…
This is to inform you that the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) has amended the Korean Trademark Examination Guidelines (“Guidelines”) regarding the goods “software” as of January 1, 2021. According to the amended Guidelines, the goods “software” are required to be specified in terms of its purpose (e.g., “game software” or “software for vehicle navigation”) for all trademark appli…
Following the revision of the Korean Patent Act with respect to the provisions for calculating damages for patent infringement, the Korean National Assembly passed a bill to revise the Korean Trademark Act, the Design Protection Act, and the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act to allow a rightful owner to claim damages for the infringer’s sale of infringing products excee…